Friday, July 31, 2026

Viewings: July 2026

This month’s selection is a case of the underdog and the outsider both rising to the top during the season of the summer flopbusters. Two exceptional films that are easily my two biggest 2026  highlights so far.

Curry Barker demonstrates that a YouTube filmmaker can produce an ultra-low-budget horror film that transcends its targeted Gen Z audience. Obsession’s phenomenal success can also be attributed to Inde Navarrette’s breakout performance. Good to know she maintains her grounded approach by continuing to produce Let’s Play videos while being one of the most talked-about actors of the summer.

Similarly, Kenji Tanigaki’s The Furious is a stand-out martial arts film, and exemplifies the superiority in quality of Asian brawlers over the typical fix-it-in-post Hollywood actioner. That five-man rumble is epic.

 

Film:
Any Old Port! (James W. Horne, 1932) ^
Invaders from Mars (William Cameron Menzies, 1953) 
The Gorgon (Terence Fisher, 1964) 
Westworld (Michael Crichton, 1973) 
Escape from New York (John Carpenter, 1981) 
To Live and Die in L.A. (William Friedkin, 1986) 
  Spontaneous Combustion (Tobe Hooper, 1989)
Falling Down (Joel Schumacher, 1993) 
Welcome II the Terrordome (Ngozi Onwurah, 1994)
Event Horizon (Paul W.S. Anderson, 1997) 
Cold Prey AKA Fritt Vilt (Roar Uthaug, 2006) 
Cold Prey II AKA Fritt Vilt II (Mats Stenberg, 2008) ♲
Cold Prey III AKA Fritt Vilt III (Mikkel Brænne Sandemose, 2010)
Diabolik (Antonio Manetti & Marco Manetti, 2021)
Diabolik: Ginko Attacks! (Antonio Manetti & Marco Manetti, 2022)
Diabolik: Who Are You? (Antonio Manetti & Marco Manetti, 2023)
Carolina Caroline (Adam Rehmeier, 2025/2026)
Dolly (Rod Blackhurst, 2025/2026)
The Drama (Kristoffer Borgli, 2026)
The Furious (Kenji Tanigaki, 2025/2026) 
Masters of the Universe (Travis Knight, 2026)
Obsession (Curry Barker, 2025/2026)
Vampires of the Velvet Lounge (Adam Sherman, 2026)
 
Television:
Object Z (Daphne Shadwell, 1965)
Doctor Who - Frontios (Ron Jones, 1984)
Doctor Who - Attack of the Cybermen (Matthew Robinson, 1985) 
Mastermind (2026/2027)

 Rewatch    ^ Short


Dada Debaser Notes:

  • Apart from a smoking hot Miriam Leone, the only other positive aspect to the Manetti Bros’ Diabolik trilogy was that it prompted me to review the more accomplished 1968 film after God knows how long.
  • Speaking of trilogies, I finally got around to watching the third and final part of the Cold Prey franchise. It’s a notable departure from the previous films in Norway’s flagship slasher series but decent, nonetheless.
  • Tinfoil hat time: the critical reappraisal for the dystopian and horrendously awful Welcome II the Terrordome, which cashed in on Public Enemy's style and music, is nothing more than a convoluted effort to peddle the inevitable Criterion/BFI Blu-ray to gullible cinephiles. A similar deal to the revisionist love for Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles.
  • "Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see." Event Horizon is more Hellraiser-in-space than what Hellraiser: Bloodline turned out to be. RIP Sam Neill!
  • Carolina Caroline is a clichéd and mediocre Bonnie and Clyde tale made tolerable by Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner's performances. Starting to think Dinner in America was a one hit wonder for Adam Rehmeier.
  • Spontaneous Combustion is essentially Tobe Hooper doing Scanners. The film is a mess, but the pyrotechnic horror effects are genuinely good and Brad Dourif never disappoints.
  • The Drama is filled with the most insufferable and cringe-worthy characters I've seen all year; and I've watched Primate and The Bride!

Always a pleasant surprise whenever I find a novelty extra included with a Blu-ray/4K UHD. Willem Dafoe's mug on a counterfeit $20 bill is the latest example of this inside Arrow's To Live and Die in L.A. packaging. Other goodies I hope to be included from the subgenre of crooked cop films are Harvey Keitel's school run coke from Bad Lieutenant (1992); the vomit pen from Training Day (2001); and Vince Vaughn's salt shaker from Dragged Across Concrete (2018).

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

The Man of Steal

Danger: Diabolik (Mario Bava, 1968)

Until recently, I had deliberately delayed reviewing Mario Bava’s deliriously, mad cap film Danger: Diabolik (1968) due to not having read any of the comics it was adapted from. The master thief known as Diabolik was created by Italian sisters Angela and Luciana Giussani in 1962. He was more of an anti-hero/villain, given his motivations and actions. From my understanding, the ingenious thief, with a maniacal laugh, would not hesitate to murder any innocent bystander who stood in his way. Hence, the book is allegedly more subversive than traditional comics of that era. Diabolik’s popularity spawned a whole sub-genre of Italian comics known as fumetti neri (dark comics) and gave rise to other notorious characters: Kriminal, Satanik and Sadik; some of which had their own film adaptations.

I found it challenging to locate an English translation of Diabolik . As an alternative, I decided to watch the recent trilogy of films directed by the Manetti Brothers: Diabolik (2021); Diabolik: Ginko Attacks! (2022) and Diabolik: Who Are You? (2024). Fans of the comic consider the trilogy to be more faithful to the source material compared to Bava’s film. After binge-watching all three films, I shan’t bother with the comic books. They are drab, dire and completely lifeless. The complete opposite of Bava's adaptation. All three of them are diabolically bad (I thought I was being clever here, but I'll probably regret typing that sentence whenever I reread this review). Therefore, I can confidently conclude Danger: Diabolik is the superior version; regardless of its deviation from the comic.

Danger: Diabolik is pure bork overload. A visually striking Italian-French co-production, characterised by Bava’s vibrant colour palette and camera wizardry; grandiose and opulent set designs; recognisable European actors in camp mode; and Il Maestro of film composers, Ennio Morricone, creating a distinctive blend of his trademark spaghetti western sounds, ecclesiastical organs, jazzy pop and lounge lizard muzak, furthering the psychedelic experience. The result is a demented Pop-Art film that easily sits between the early James Bond films and the kitsch Batman television series.

The film’s production history was fraught with difficulties. The Nanny’s Seth Holt was the original director when filming commenced in 1965; with Jean Sorel being cast as the titular character. Producer Dino De Laurentiis was dissatisfied with the dailies and production was brought to a halt until Mario Bava was hired to restart the film on a significantly reduced budget. Sorel was out by this time. Having already been familiar with the comic, John Phillip Law secured the lead after impressing De Laurentiis with his dastardly eyebrow expressions; a skill essential when having to wear a latex balaclava while racing around in a speedboat or a sport scar. Bava was unhappy with Catherine Deneuve as Eva Kent, Diabolik's beautiful girlfriend and partner in crime. The Austrian bombshell Marisa Mell was subsequently cast in her place. This proved to be a successful casting decision as Law and Mell exhibited great onscreen chemistry and contributed to the racy scenes in the film.

In terms of the film’s plot, Diabolik’s ingenious and daring heists have driven the nameless European country’s Minister of Interior, played by the gap-toothed, British toff Terry-Thomas, to extreme measures: by enforcing the death penalty on all criminals. His arch-nemesis, Inspector Ginko (Michel Piccoli), is counting on the crime syndicate, led by Ralph Valmont (Adolfo Celi, virtually reprising his villainous role as Emilio Largo from the 1965 James Bond film Thunderball) to rid them of the master thief. Following the kidnapping of his beloved Eva and a free-falling confrontation with Valmont, Diabolik steals the world’s largest gold ingot. Unaware that traces of the ingot were irradiated under Ginko’s orders, thus the objects serves as a homing device. This leads to the law's discovery of Diabolik’s secret lair and the film’s climactic finale.

Bava’s film presents an intriguing dynamic by positioning Diabolik against both law enforcement and the criminal underworld; forcing the master thief into an anti-hero. This is evident when he unleashes a bombing campaign against the state’s tax department after learning of their enforcement of the death penalty. By not permitting Diabolik to steal, he will reciprocate by preventing the government from doing the same. His anti-establishment and individualistic nature comes across as subversive and ahead of its time for a 1960s comic book character.

Danger: Diabolik is an exceptional visual experience for those who appreciate wonderfully eccentric and vibrant cinema. Mario Bava was a masterful filmmaker; renowned for his exquisite cinematic eye, autistic levels of detail to the mise-en-scène and ingenious visual effects. Bava demonstrated his ability to create a wonderfully whimsical and trippy comic book movie with the same care and attention to the sumptuous, atmospheric, gothic Italian horror he became renowned for. A very versatile and capable director, who was unjustly lumped as a poor man's Alfred Hitchcock.

The elaborate sets provide an exceptional playground that are a huge part to the film’s charm. The most notable is Diabolik’s underground lair. An eye-catching, post-modernist structure built within a vast cavern. It’s spectacular enough to rival some of Ernst Stavro Blofeld’s residences. The home is furnished with modern conveniences including his and hers groovy showers and a giant, rotating circular bed (you won’t find one of them in Dreams) where they make passionate love all day amongst all their stolen cash. Not exactly hygienic, but a lifestyle I can respect. The lair is surrounded by a fleet of Jaguar E-Types; the protagonist’s trademark wheels. With a subterranean entrance to the sea, Diabolik’s hideout comes complete with its own submarine. A convenient transport for moving a giant gold ingot. Above all, I’m particularly fond of the giant pipe organ which serves as the lair’s security alarm. A unique, yet very fitting device for any supervillain.

Sources suggest the reason a sequel was never made was that Bava did not enjoy his experience working with De Laurentiis. Alternatively, the film’s commercial failure is a more plausible explanation. If Danger: Diabolik had been successful, a sequel would have been produced even without Bava’s involvement. Regardless of which is true, it is now considered a cult film and often listed amongst the best comic book movies by various media. 

Danger: Diabolik did not leave the same first impression on me as Bava's gothic horror films initially did. The film has greatly grown on me with subsequent revisits. I think it might have been Diabolik’s quintessential European stylings and campiness being not to my taste during my edge lord youth. This was a time when Batman had long abandoned the campiness of the ‘60s television series and embraced the dark and gothic sensibilities as reflected by Tim Burton’s 1989 Batman film. Since then, however, I have found Danger: Diabolik deeply refreshing in comparison to the irreverent deconstruction and revisionism committed to familiar comics book characters today. They are trends that have become increasingly tiresome and clichéd for me. Hence, a fictional character who steals for the adrenaline rush and to support his lavish lifestyle with his sexy girlfriend, is both beautifully simplistic and far more appealing to me than the latest Marvel and DC slop.

One of Mario Bava’s greatest films.

Eureka has recently released a superb 4K UHD of Danger: Diabolik as part of its Masters of Cinema series. This is perhaps my favourite boutique film release of the year. Alternatively, I would highly recommend that those who have not seen the film to check it out for free on YouTube. Deep, deep down, you know you want to!

Friday, July 24, 2026

20/2020s

The Zone of Interest (Jonathan Glazer, 2023)
Dinner in America (Adam Rehmeier, 2020)
The Northman (Robert Eggers, 2022)
Mad God (Phil Tippett, 2021)
The Substance (Coralie Fargeat, 2024)
Obsession (Curry Barker, 2025)
Benedetta (Paul Verhoeven, 2021)
Hatching (Hanna Bergholm, 2022)
No One Will Save You (Brian Duffield, 2023)
Crimes of the Future (David Cronenberg, 2022)
Furiosa: A Mad Max Story (George Miller, 2024)
Godzilla Minus One (Takashi Yamazaki, 2023)
R.R.R. (S.S. Rajamouli, 2022)
Deadstream (Joseph Winter & Vanessa Winter, 2022)
Last Night in Soho (Edgar Wright, 2021)
MadS (David Moreau, 2024)
The Furious (Kenji Tanigaki, 2025)
Apples (Christos Nikou, 2020)
Anora (Sean Baker, 2024)
Warfare (Ray Mendoza & Alex Garland, 2025)

If you're unfamiliar with the 20/2020s meta, it's essentially your top twenty films of the decade.

It took me just over six and a half years to complete this; which is about six years longer than the average, smooth-brained Letterboxd user when they compiled one.

I wouldn’t say I’m a stickler for perfection, but it took me a while to find enough worthy films that cut through all the noise and glazing. The list is also a constant reminder that I haven't reviewed Dinner in America or Last Night in Soho yet.

With three years and some change left, there are bound to be a bunch of future titles which will qualify and switch up the current list above. At least, I hope so. Imagine the cultural landscape if there weren’t.

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Actions Speak Louder Than Words

The Furious (Kenji Tanigaki, 2025/2026)

As an aficionado of onscreen violence, I am particularly drawn to action films that feature intense combat sequences, copious amounts of pain and a dash of blood or two. Fortunately, acclaimed fight choreographer Kenji Tanigaki, who was involved in one of your host’s favourite action films in recent years - Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (2024), has transitioned to film directing and has subsequently delivered an action-packed bruiser that’s a summer riot.

The Furious (2025/2026) follows Wang Wei (Xie Miao), a mute, Chinese handyman working “Somewhere in Southeast Asia” (the location is intentionally left vague), as he embarks on a mission to rescue his young daughter, Rainy (Yang Enyou), from child traffickers. He forms an alliance with Navin (Joe Taslim), who shares a similar motive in finding his missing journalist wife. The premise is straightforward and the plot is not particularly complex. The narrative’s simplicity justifies the pair’s decision to launch a series of devastating assaults on numerous machete-wielding adversaries in locations connected to the trafficking leader Paklung’s (Joey Iwanaga) operation.

Wei may lack the ability of speech, but martial arts skills do all the necessary talking in his quest to retrieve his daughter. Throughout his journey with Navin, the extent of the trafficking operation’s reach is revealed, including the corrupt police captain who remains indifferent as desperate children attempt to escape from a dilapidated apartment building known as The Snake Pit.

The fight scenes are choreographed with expert precision; drawing the eye deeper into the intensity of the battle. The impact of every punch, kick and weapon used is viscerally wince-inducing. Bones are shattered, blood is spilt, and in some cases, body parts are severed. This is back from the pub heaven for your humble host. Meteor Cheung’s cinematography is characterised by a fluid dynamic that mirrors the chaotic visual spectacle of the unrelenting action that occurs on screen.

Diminutive Miao’s strict kung fu discipline is contrasted with Taslim’s more erratic judo skills. When Wei mistakenly identifies Navin as a child trafficker, the pair briefly engage in a fight. A comedic moment occurs when Miao removes his jacket as he warms up to unleash pain. To Navin’s relief, he realises that Wei shares a similar objective and they subsequently team up. For fans of the game-changing martial arts classic The Raid (2011), Taslim has a rematch with the indomitable Yayan Ruhian. The latter plays a ruthless henchman to Paklung; who wields a deadly bow, upping the bloody gore quota considerably. However, Brian Le almost steals the film as the bald, dungaree-clad Ho, a strong and persistent antagonist who is more than a match for the combined skills of Wei and Navin. Ho is instrumental in the film’s unforgettable pièce de résistance; consisting of an epic two versus two versus one rumble.

The English dubbing may be an issue for some viewers. While it did not detract from my enjoyment of the film, it was sufficiently noticeable to warrant mentioning it for this review. Apparently, there is a Mandarin language version of the film; one that includes some different scenes. This is enough to interest me in determining which might be the better cut of the film in the foreseeable future. Although, given The Furious is a martial arts film of a very high calibre, it's a win for action film fans, regardless of which version they watch.

The Furious is an excellent martial arts film. Blending the premise of Taken with the intense action of The Raid, and if that justifies it with the label of dadsploitation movie by some, then so be it. Hail to 2026's big daddy of action flicks!

Thursday, July 16, 2026

Picks of 2016

2016 was a year for the underdog, a sentiment reflected in several films I enjoyed. Korean horror, low budget thrillfests and problematic action films were my personal highlights in a period dominated by endless comic book movies, unwanted remakes and shameless sequels. No change from any other year then.

The Autopsy of Jane Doe (André Øvredal)
The Belko Experiment (Greg McLean)
Don't Breathe (Fede Álvarez) 
The Girl with All the Gifts (Colm McCarthy) 
Hotel Coolgardie (Pete Gleeson)
Hush (Mike Flanagan)
London Has Fallen (Babak Najafi) 
The Neon Demon (Nicolas Winding Refn)
The Nice Guys (Shane Black) 
The Shallows (Jaume Collet-Serra)
Terrifier (Damien Leone) 
Train to Busan (Yeon Sang-ho)
The Wailing (Na Hong-jin)

I remember being mostly positive about Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, but I've not cared for anything Star Wars related after the deluge of awful films and TV shows ever since. 

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Freaky Nikki

Obsession (Curry Barker, 2025/2026)

The Hollywood film industry is experiencing a decline in relevance, a trend that has become more pronounced this summer. Film production has become a large-scale corporate endeavour where hundreds of millions of dollars are invested in formulaic and rehashed blockbusters rather than creative properties with a more modest budget. Expectations for grossly expensive tentpole films  are often deemed as commercial failures whenever they fail to surpass the billion-dollar box office threshold. This has become an unrealistic expectation for an entertainment industry struggling to maintain the interests of the public. Hence, Blumhouse Productions, a film company with a history in low-budget horror, will always survive Hollywood’s downhill decline, like a cockroach after the nuclear holocaust. All it takes is one of its films to make it big to keep funding a multitude of other potential winners. Its latest co-production, is a monumental success story. At the time of writing, it has earned over 400 times its budget at the box office, and is one of the most profitable films ever made.

Curry Barker’s Obsession (2025/2026) is a variation of W.W. Jacobs’s 1902 horror tale The Monkey’s Paw. It applies the concept to a twisted love story. Barker’s slick writing and direction, along with strong performances from its unknown cast (notably, Inde Navarrette in her breakout role) make Obsession one of the year’s most significant film releases. Notably Barker was a 26-year-old YouTube comedy film maker and Navarette a younger Twitch streamer when they made the film. This demonstrates non-traditional paths to success in the film industry for Gen Z.

Baron ‘Bear’ Bailey (Michael Johnson), a shy and amiable individual, has romantic feelings for his friend and colleague Nikki Freeman (Navarrette). However, he is too timid to express his true feelings for her, which causes considerable frustration for their two fellow friends Ian (Cooper Tomlinson) and Sarah (Megan Lawless), who also work at the music store with them. The film emphasises the extent of Bear’s shyness with a painful rehearsal of his feelings at the very start of the film. Adding to the situation is the accidental death of Bear’s cat Sandy, on the very day he planned to confess his true love for Nikki.

At a new age crystal shop, Bear purchases a One Wish Willow toy as a last-minute substitute for the tiger’s eye pendant Nikki had recently lost. After the group departs from a pub quiz, Bear takes Nikki home. His nervousness in revealing his love for her results in an awkward sequence during which he even calls her “Freaky Nikki”, a nickname she despises. Nikki confronts Bear with the opportunity he wanted and asks whether he fancies her. Like a coward, he tells her that he sees her only as a good friend. With the opportunity lost and Nikki in her home, Bear holds the One Wish Willow and frustratingly wishes for Nikki Freeman to love him "more than anyone in the fucking world". Within an instant, Nikki returns to Bear’s car and behaves strangely; she even requests to spend the night at his home.

Bear’s wish has tragic consequences for all four featured characters. The most evident is Nikki’s total character transformation. The moments where Nikki eerily converses in the dark, along with her physical movements are intensely creepy. Navarrette’s performance is outstanding and should make her a star. The talented young actress conveys a range of emotions that effectively emphasises Nikki’s loss of autonomy; as if she is possessed. This may be the case as the real Nikki briefly resurfaces while her possessor is sleeping.

Nikki: Kill me, please!

Bear: What?
 
Nikki: She's sleeping. It's me.

Bear: You are you, Nikki.
 
Nikki: Ssh! Please, don't wake her up. Just... kill me!
 
Bear: What would be so bad? What's so bad about being with me?
 
Nikki: I've never been with you, Bear... Just kill me, please! Please, please, please, please!
This scene reveals that beneath his affable exterior, Bear is the film’s real antagonist. His primary concern is being in a relationship with Nikki; regardless of her own personal welfare, or the abnormal affect of her  actions and behaviour brought about her complete devotion to him. Therefore, the film demonstrates that his feelings for her are based on an idealistic vision of Nikki rather than actual Nikki. This explains why the cowardly abuser is willing to continue the façade of a loving relationship with Nikki while she serves Sandy the cat in Bear’s packed lunch; duct tapes his front door to keep him home with her; and mutilates herself during a game of Jenga. Bear’s cowardice is a constant throughout the course of the film.

Despite the familiar premise, Barker has crafted a film blessed that's an addictive viewing experience with morally ambiguous characters. They are more complex than the typical protagonists found in mainstream horror films. Bear may be a cowardly scumbag, but his initial plight makes him appear sympathetic. Similarly, Nikki is portrayed as a seemingly innocent individual. However, she’s later revealed to have been manipulative to Bear, prior to his wish. That doesn't excuse the hell of what she's put through, however. These character layers makes them far more three dimensional, in my opinion.

Obsession has resonated with a broad audience of filmgoers; both young and old. This is likely due to its ability to transform a narrative about love and obsession into a terrifying horror story. A concept that many might relate to. Consequently, Obsession is comparable to an old fable whose moral message is still relevant centuries on. A remarkable achievement from such a young cast and crew.

Loved it to death.